Contrast-induced nephropathy in cancer patients: A case-control study
Original Research
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Carlos Calle Caamaño, Patricia Tamayo Aguilar, Ena Coloma Coloma, Geovanny Mera Rebutti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33821/573Keywords:
Contrast media, Creatinine, Nephropathy, Tomography, Risk factorsAbstract
Introduction: Contrast Induced Nephropathy (CIN) is a complication caused by intravenous administration of contrast media for imaging studies, which increases morbidity and mortality and hospital costs. The incidence ranges from 2% in people without risk factors, and can reach up to 25 to 50% when predisposing factors are associated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the development of CIN in hospitalized cancer and non-cancer patients, their clinical characteristics, prevalence, associated factors, and the application of a pre-exposure risk scale.
Methodology: A case-control study was carried out at the “Abel Gilbert Pontón” Hospitals and the “Dr. Juan Tanca Marengo ”- Guayaquil in the period April to September 2020. The sample was non-probabilistic, of patients with and without oncological diagnosis. Contrast tomography was required in both groups. Age, sex, type of cancer, presence of Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM), arterial hypertension, creatinine at baseline and at 48 hours were recorded. A pre-exposure scale for CIN was used. The prevalences are compared with Chi2, and the associations with Odds Ratio.
Results: There were 100 cases and 100 controls. The prevalence of CIN was 28% in non-cancer patients and 22% in oncological patients (P = 0.33). The associated risk factor was Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (OR 2.19 [95% CI 1.0007 - 4.808; P = 0.0498). The previous creatinine value had no effect on the outcome of nephropathy. The distribution of pre-exposure categories did not show significant differences between the patients who developed CIN in relation to those who did not develop (P = 0.063).
Conclusion: The development of CIN is not influenced by age, sex, patient and hypertension, but is associated with the presence of DM2. Pre-exposure risk stratification was not useful in this case, its distribution was similar in patients with or without CIN.