Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer: a systematic review

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Vázquez-Gómez, S., & Díaz-Fernández, A. (2025). Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Oncology Journal (Ecuador), 35(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.33821/777

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33821/777

Keywords:

endometrial cancer, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors

Abstract

Introduction: Endometrial cancer is the most common malignant neoplasm of the female genital tract in developed countries. The standard first-line treatment in advanced stages is platinum-based chemotherapy. However, a standardized chemotherapy regimen is not available for second and subsequent lines after disease progression. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which target PD-1 proteins (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, dostarlimab, and sintilimab) or PD-L1 (durvalumab and avelumab), have emerged as effective alternatives in the second-line treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, either as monotherapy or in combination with other targeted therapies. Materials and Methods: We conducted a bibliographic search of articles published in the last 5 years. Databases such as PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane have been used for this purpose. Results: Twelve articles were selected for review that collect efficacy and safety data on the use of immunotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer who have previously received at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy treatment. Four of the publications refer to the use of pembrolizumab, in monotherapy or associated with lenvatinib, two of them being carried out by the same research team. Conclusions: Immunotherapy presents a high response rate in advanced endometrial cancer that expresses alteration of the DNA base repair pathway and microsatellite instability. In comparison to conventional chemotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer, immunotherapy has shown efficacy, either as monotherapy or in combination with other targeted therapies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Silvia Vázquez-Gómez, Hospital Universitario Álvaro Cunqueiro

Hospital Universitario Álvaro Cunqueiro (Vigo). Servicio de Farmacia.

Alba Díaz-Fernández, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti

Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti (Lugo). Servicio de Farmacia.

References

Escalera AC, García LM, García SJ, Garrido HR, Reoyo JA. Revisión bibliográfica del cáncer de endometrio. Med Gen. 2010;133:703-7.

Lee NK, Cheung MK, Shin JY, Husain A, Teng NN, Berek JS, et al. Prognostic factors for uterine cancer in reproductive-aged women. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(3):655-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000255980.88205.15

Alvarado-Cabrero I. Adenocarcinoma de endometrio, Conceptos actuales. Gac Mex Oncol. 2012;11(3):196-202.

Guevara M, Molinuevo A, Salmerón D, Marcos-Gragera R, Carulla M, Chirlaque M-D, et al. Cancer survival in adults in Spain: A population-based study of the Spanish network of cancer registries (REDECAN). Cancers. 2022;14(10):2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102441

Oncoguía SEGO: Cáncer de Endometrio 2023. Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstreticia (SEGO). 2023. Disponible en: https://oncosego.sego.es/uploads/app/1283/elements/file/file1677140604.pdf

Oaknin A, Bosse TJ, Creutzberg CL, Giornelli G, Harter P, Joly F, et al. Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(9):860-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.009

Lu KH, Schorge JO, Rodabaugh KJ, Daniels MS, Sun CC, Soliman PT, et al. Prospective determination of prevalence of Lynch syndrome in young women with endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5158-64.

Mittica G, Ghisoni E, Giannone G, Aglietta M, Genta S, Valabrega G. Checkpoint inhibitors in endometrial cancer: preclinical rationale and clinical activity. Oncotarget. 2017;8(52):90532-44. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20042

Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS). Informe de Posicionamiento Terapéutico de pembrolizumab (Keytruda) en combinación con lenvatinib (Lenvima) para el tratamiento del carcinoma endometrial avanzado o recurrente. PT-200/V1/21112023. Disponible en: https://www.aemps.gob.es/medicamentosUsoHumano/informesPublicos/docs/2023/IPT-200-Pembrolizumab-Keytruda-Lenvima.pdf

Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (SEFH). Revisión de fármacos: Cáncer ginecológico. Entrevista clínica y atención farmacéutica al paciente oncohematológico. 2022. Disponible en: https://gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gedefo/images/2022/MOGcancerginec.pdf

Pectasides D, Xiros N, Papaxoinis G, Pectasides E, Sykiotis C, Koumarianou A, et al. Carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(2):250-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.028

Arora E, Masab M, Mittar P, Jindal V, Gupta S, Dourado C. Role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Cureus. 2018;10(4):e2521. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2521

Rubinstein M, Shen S, Monk BJ, Tan DSP, Nogueira-Rodrigues A, Aoki D, et al. Looking beyond carboplatin and paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;167(3):540-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.10.012

Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS). Ficha Técnica de Keytruda® (pembrolizumab). Disponible en: https://cima.aemps.es/cima/dochtml/ft/1151024001/FT_1151024001.html

Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026

Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A, Ford R, Schwartz LH, Mandrekar S, et al. iRECIST: Guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(3):e143-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30074-8

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. May 28, 2009 (v4.03: June 14, 2010). National Cancer Institute.

Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron, I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow, CD et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160